A major change to how education leadership works in Oklahoma is moving forward, as lawmakers consider shifting power from voters to government officials.
What the New Proposal Is About
The Oklahoma House has passed two key measures that could change how the state superintendent and Board of Education are selected. The most significant proposal, House Joint Resolution 1055, would allow voters to decide whether the superintendent should become an appointed position instead of an elected one.
If approved, the governor would choose the superintendent, but only from a shortlist prepared by the Oklahoma State Board of Education. The Senate would also need to confirm the appointment.
Changes to the State Board of Education
Another bill, House Bill 3327, would expand the Board of Education from seven to nine members. The appointments would be divided among different leaders:
- Four members chosen by the governor
- Two appointed by the House speaker
- Two appointed by the Senate president pro tem
The superintendent would still serve as the board’s chair.
Currently, the governor already appoints most board members, but the superintendent is elected by the public. This new plan would change that balance significantly.
Why Lawmakers Want This Change
Supporters, including Governor Kevin Stitt, believe appointing the superintendent could improve coordination and leadership in education policy.
The idea gained momentum after the resignation of former superintendent Ryan Walters, which temporarily allowed the governor to appoint someone to the role. That situation led to discussions about making the position permanently appointed.
Lawmakers like Rep. Mike Osburn, who introduced the measures, say the system is still being refined and could improve how decisions are made in the education system.
Concerns Raised by Critics
Not everyone agrees with the proposal. Some lawmakers worry that it could give too much power to the governor.
For example, Andy Fugate raised concerns that the governor could gain extra influence on multiple boards by appointing both the superintendent and several board members.
Critics argue that removing elections from the process could reduce public accountability and limit voter control over education leadership.
What Happens Next
Both measures have now moved to the state Senate for further review. If the constitutional amendment is approved by lawmakers, it will go to Oklahoma voters for final approval.
If voters agree, the change would take effect in November 2034. Until then, the superintendent would continue to be elected.
The proposed changes to Oklahoma’s education leadership system could reshape how decisions are made in schools across the state. Supporters believe it will bring stronger coordination, while critics worry about reduced public control and increased political influence.
As the bills move forward, the final decision may ultimately rest with voters, making this an important issue for the future of education in Oklahoma.
